Home Blog Page 464

Nooka Photos

0

Got some shots of the new Nooka line including the limited edition Zot. The new pieces have clear acrylic in the dots to prevent the dreaded “shadow/reflection” problem that plagued some of the earlier models. All of them look great.

SPEEDTECH Weather Watch Pro

2

Now this is a piece of wrist tech – a real with watch with windspeed impeller and it can be worn on a lanyard.


Handy tool measures wind speed, barometric pressure with nine-hour history graph, altitude and temperature with wind chill. Features chronograph, timer, clock with alarm and date, EL backlight and compass. Wear as a watch or hook onto lanyard (both wrist strap and lanyard are included)

SPEEDTECH Weather Watch Pro [Lab Safety Supply]

Special Offer for TSL Readers: Quo Vadimus

2

From TheSportingLife.net – Just got in touch with Mark over at Quo Vadimus cigars and he wanted to pass along to some cigar savings to the readers of the Sporting Life. Each of these things is hand rolled and is an excellent smoke, well worth the initial investment.


For readers of TheSportingLife.Net, Quo Vadimus will provide:

Free Priority Mail Shipping with every order.
10% discount on all full bundles
10% discount on all single sticks.

In addition, we do a 2-for-1 plan. For each single stick
you buy we give a free “Lil Jp” which is a 5″ x 34 stick.

When they place the order, all they need to do is refer to
TheSportingLife.Net and that will get them the discounts.

Read on for more info or check them out here.

Review: Zlatoust Diver

23

Captain’s Log – 0600 hours – Baltic Sea – My men and I have surfaced near Gdansk where we stopped for McDonald’s Hamburgers (made with imperialist swine) and some Polish beer. We are testing our Zlatoust diving watches (AKA the CCCP diver) made at the Zlatoust factory in our glorious Russian homeland.

What Makes a Patek Better than a Seiko

0

Good questions on the PMWF: So what makes a Patek better than a Rolex better than a Seiko?

So we were kicking this around over at a sportscar BBS I hang out at. Everyone just SAYS a Rolex is better than a Seiko however a Patek Phillipe is better than a Rolex. As far as I can tell a high end Seiko has a excelent fit and finish will last as long and will keep just as good time as a Patek.

To add my two cents, I’ve seen high end watches being hand-made by German virgins in the little town of Glashutte and it’s an amazing sight. Each part is so delicate and requires so much patience and care that you’re really getting a hand-made device. Is it worth $10,000? Nah. But it’s impressive.

So what makes a Patek better than a Rolex better than a Seiko? [PMWF]

Fish Finding Watch

1

Fishies!

The floating sensor attaches to your fishing line and transmits the images of the fish onto the LCD screen on the wrist unit in real time.

FISH FINDING WATCH [the cool hunter]

Ventura SPARC rx

1

Kind of digging the Ventura line, including the SPARC rx which has a rotating “bezel” which actually lets you rotate the entire face a la Nike sports watches.

This piece is designed by Paolo Fancelli and has a Durinox case, whatever that means.

Collection [Ventura]

Contact Us

15

To contact WWR, please email john at wristwatchrewiew dot com. For more information, please visit my site.

AIM me at johnbiggsny

Our Review Policy

1

Dear Readers,

I recently got off the phone with the founder of a watch brand who was recently discussed on this site. He was very calm and polite, and because he was extremely civil and willing to negotiate, I agreed with his wishes to have a negative opinion piece removed from WWR. The threat of a lawsuit was tossed out during this discussion, and, as WWR is a labor of love and the many advertisements I have on the site barely pays for hosting fees, I am unwilling and unable to retain legal council when these sorts of things come up, the threat of which is real and has a chilling effect on electronic discourse. Therefore, I will state the following and this should be used as a guide for anyone else wishing to threaten legal action.

This site may contain opinion based in, in part, on Internet research. As a rule, some Internet research is incorrect. Unless this research is refuted by the parties it effects, it can be considered opinion. The Internet allows readers to accept or ignore opinion, obviously affecting sales or brand awareness, as many major and minor product manufacturers have discovered over the years.

As a rule, negative opinions, posts, and reviews will be removed/edited only when the following conditions are met:

1. The requester sends a detailed description of their manufacturing methods and sales channels.
2. The requester explains their connection with so-called “Ebay Brands” i.e. brands that misrepresent their pedigree, are sold at seemingly a massive loss ($10,000 watches selling for $9.99) and feature movements of known dubious quality while describing themselves as high-quality pieces.
3. The requester can adequately defend their brand/pieces in light of popular opinion and real reviews found online.

One of our goals at WWR is to help the novice and advanced collector learn about an industry that is rife with fraud and copyright infringement. Watch makers misrepresent their pieces all the time by using parts and movements that are sub-par while claiming a long heritage of high quality pieces. This must stop. If, by following the above guidelines, we are able to clear up misconceptions about genuinely legitimate watch manufacturers, I feel we have done the watch community a great service. If a company attacks an entry on this blog with threats of lawsuits and angry comments, then, to quote the Bard, “the lady doth protest too much, methinks.” In short, put up or shut up.

Again, the founder of this brand was civil and willing to discuss his watches at length and was amicable to submitting some pieces for review in the future. Watch manufacturers are encouraged to submit watches for review by contacting [email protected] with the assurance that they will be returned undamaged after a brief review period.

If you feel your brand has been wrongly represented, please contact me, John Biggs at [email protected], with the above information.

As a rule, WWR does not in any way represent any one manufacturer and we are completely independent of all manufacturers. The contents of WWR are the sole property and opinion of the editors and neither the web hosting company nor the web hosting reseller are in any way responsible for its content.

The opinions posted on WristWatchReview are solely those of the author. WristWatchReview does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any message, and WristWatchReview is not responsible for the contents of any post.

Advertising on WWR

2

Wrist Watch Review welcomes sponsorships and classified ads. To purchase a classified advertisement, please visit AdBrite for information. To sponsor the page for a week or month, please email john at wristwatchreview dot com. Each sponsor will receive ad space on all three of our BWL sites, Slushpile.net, TheSportingLife.net, and WristWatchReview.com. We have over 3,000 daily visitors combined and WWR’s usage statistics are public and available here.